<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google&#8217;s Local Business Center Should Allow Shared Users</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.geolocalseo.com/blog/google-maps-lbc-should-allow-shared-users/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.geolocalseo.com/blog/google-maps-lbc-should-allow-shared-users/</link>
	<description>In the trenches of local search</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 Jun 2010 20:24:31 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Transfering Ownership of Local Listings in Google Maps &#124; GEO Local SEO</title>
		<link>http://www.geolocalseo.com/blog/google-maps-lbc-should-allow-shared-users/comment-page-1/#comment-10</link>
		<dc:creator>Transfering Ownership of Local Listings in Google Maps &#124; GEO Local SEO</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jan 2010 02:43:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geolocalseo.com/blog/?p=32#comment-10</guid>
		<description>[...] I recommended that Google should be allowing shared user access in the LBC [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I recommended that Google should be allowing shared user access in the LBC [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SearchCap: The Day In Search, January 5, 2010</title>
		<link>http://www.geolocalseo.com/blog/google-maps-lbc-should-allow-shared-users/comment-page-1/#comment-8</link>
		<dc:creator>SearchCap: The Day In Search, January 5, 2010</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jan 2010 21:54:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geolocalseo.com/blog/?p=32#comment-8</guid>
		<description>[...] Google LBC Accounts Should Allow Shared Users, GEO Local SEO [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Google LBC Accounts Should Allow Shared Users, GEO Local SEO [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Shotland</title>
		<link>http://www.geolocalseo.com/blog/google-maps-lbc-should-allow-shared-users/comment-page-1/#comment-6</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Shotland</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jan 2010 04:02:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geolocalseo.com/blog/?p=32#comment-6</guid>
		<description>Welcome back to the jungle Stever!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Welcome back to the jungle Stever!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Will Scott</title>
		<link>http://www.geolocalseo.com/blog/google-maps-lbc-should-allow-shared-users/comment-page-1/#comment-5</link>
		<dc:creator>Will Scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jan 2010 03:07:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geolocalseo.com/blog/?p=32#comment-5</guid>
		<description>Steve,

Great post!

The way we deal with this is to create a new Google account and claim the listing with that. We then share the login information with our clients.

This way our clients have control. We can be kicked out if they change the password and it means that to some extent we&#039;re carrying the risk. And, we have more of a challenge in maintaining multiple IDs on behalf of our clients.

And, of course, we don&#039;t have ownership of those accounts as a switching cost.

That said, it&#039;s totally worth it. We are much more interested in a relationship based on trust than one built on manufactured control.

I&#039;m expecting great things from your new site!

Looks good,
Will</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Steve,</p>
<p>Great post!</p>
<p>The way we deal with this is to create a new Google account and claim the listing with that. We then share the login information with our clients.</p>
<p>This way our clients have control. We can be kicked out if they change the password and it means that to some extent we&#8217;re carrying the risk. And, we have more of a challenge in maintaining multiple IDs on behalf of our clients.</p>
<p>And, of course, we don&#8217;t have ownership of those accounts as a switching cost.</p>
<p>That said, it&#8217;s totally worth it. We are much more interested in a relationship based on trust than one built on manufactured control.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m expecting great things from your new site!</p>
<p>Looks good,<br />
Will</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
